Now don’t get me wrong, I love Spider-Man. I can’t think of another character I
can relate to more than Peter Parker. Yet, like any true fanboy, I can't help but get
exasperated beyond belief when I see a favourite franchise taken to places
I don’t agree with. Case in
point, The Amazing Spider-Man 2
(which is partly based on the Ultimate Spider-Man universe).It seemed that every piece of news I heard leading up to this film's release caused my despair to grow more and more, as yet another villain was thrown into the mix or another production statement released. The film seemed to become more concerned with setting up future spin offs and sequels; I worried about how crammed and rushed it would feel. The trailers didn’t help this either as I spotted hints that only comic fans would pick up on (no examples in order to avoid spoilers!). I realised that there was more going on in this than Sony were explicitly stating, which made me think that key plot points would be skipped over. Worse still, the film's main villain is Electro, one of my least favourite of Spidey’s rogues’gallery, second only to my most-hated, Rhino (who was then subsequently shown in trailers as well). The final moment of despair was when I heard the addition of a variation of Green Goblin, the best antagonist in my mind, and I wept at the thought of him, of all characters, being tacked on for sequels' sake.
 |
| This didn't exactly scream Green Goblin to me. More like scabby hobo-man... |
The
previous film,The Amazing Spider-Man, created a term in my mind; what I
call the 'Spider-Man effect'. This is when I seem to enjoy a film at the
time, yet on reflection, I start finding flaws I had not noticed upon viewing. It gets worse when people then point out flaws and I can't help but agree. For instance, whilst I initially loved Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker, I couldn't help but agree that his portrayal flips between nerd to skater boy and then finally emo (although his hair is far too stylized for any of these). I didn't pick up on this initially, as I was just enjoying the experience. Some may call it hindsight, and I guess it is easier to see said flaws when
they are pointed out to you later. One such problem I also now have is the Lizard's design - he looks more like a goomba from the live action Super Mario Bros.
film than the Lizard from the comics that I know and love. These issues have made me cynical to the point where I’d rather not watch it again for a while. Other examples of the 'Spider-Man effect' include Frozen and the Assassin’s Creed series (with horrible emphasis on Assassin’s creed III).
The bitter feelings only increased when I was made aware of the real reason for the reboot. Why, when I had heard some great rumours for Spider-Man 4, did they decide to start again? It turned out that the new films were actually made due to a contractual clause, where Sony would lose the rights to the franchise if they didn't release a film for a certain number of years.
 |
| This one point in the trailer ruined a bit of a surprise for me |
It’s
ironic, then, that the sequel has an almost polarised quality, as I entered
the cinema with dread and yet I left with a new-found appreciation for the
series. It gave me hope for the future installments. Thankfully, the film doesn't focus on
introducing too many villains as I had feared, instead focusing on characters and the relationships they share. I was particularly impressed by Gwen and
Peter, as we see them attempt to continue their lives after the fallout of Dr.
Conner’s attack. The chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone is incredibly believable and I sympathised with their rocky times, causing me to become emotional
myself. The guilt Garfield portrays is powerful, and we understand his actions that result from it. This is a worthy depiction of my much-loved character, one who has always been
ruled by his heart and not his head. Even the relationship of Peter and
Harry, which happened before the film is set, is believable; I really got the sense that they had previously been strong friends. Their first scene together starts with an awkward tension which broke through to talking about past shared experiences. It was very realistic, and reminded me of similar reunions I have had. The rekindling of the friendship builds up properly giving more
impact to the later scenes. It turned out my fears that it would seem rushed or
forced were unfounded.
 |
| This sort of image made me fear for the film |
Not
that action is forgotten, either. There is enough Spidey action to keep a good
balance of pace, and some of the Electro scenes are spectacular. Each battle is
accompanied by Electro's soundtrack, one that’s very techno and every beat and
bass drop feels natural and just epic. The handling of Electro's creation was good, too. The trailer made his transformation look a bit ridiculous - seeing him falling into a vat of eels after shocking himself looked a bit like something from Benny Hill. Yet his actual shift from Max 'the Spider-Man fan boy' Dillon to the paranoid madman with bad-ass electric powers is perfect. Even his theme song fits as the lyrics whisper symptoms of schizophrenia in a creepy fashion, giving us the effect that we can hear his frantic thoughts. Even the Rhino, although a bit too comic relief, was good, just perhaps his appearance is a bit brief.
My one issue with the villains in this film is that they seem to go down a similar path we have seen before. They start as normal people with some coincidental connection to Parker. Then they have some form of accident that messes with their sanity. Really, you should be able to shout 'bingo!' when they have a last minute change of heart and cause their own downfall.
Maybe, like with its predecessor, once hindsight kicks in I will begin to see its flaws. But
then that’s life - everything seems like it could be better on reflection.
Except hindsight. That’s always a bitch.
Except hindsight. That’s always a bitch.
